Group polarization and competitioning political behavior essay

Stoner was the first to identify and write about what he initially called risky shift. While there is a lot of attention paid to campaign finance reform, lobbying reform, PAC reform, and the peddling of influence, we never seem to realize that, most of the time, politicians are merely giving us what they think we want.

Group Polarization

As the United States becomes more extreme in its beliefs in general, group polarization and competition, which requires a mutual exclusivity of goal attainment, will lead to more "showdown" situations in which the goal of good government gives way to political posturing and power-mongering. The Case Against Competition.

There is no reason that Pete Wilson couldn't have run for President after his second term as Governor had expired. Social Comparison Social comparison theorists have developed two explanations for group polarization, both of which emphasize that individuals constantly compare themselves to the group to judge how they appear to others and to develop a sense of how they are doing socially.

Some have theorized that the earlier studies showing a preference for conformity toward an average may have been overstated. Group Influence Available from: Group polarization tends to exacerbate inter-group competition by driving any two groups who initially disagree farther apart in their respective views.

It is, therefore, unlikely, once an election is over and the process of government is supposed to begin, that politicians will be able to "forgive and forget" in order to carry on with the business at hand.

Since Pete Wilson showed no inherent loyalty toward a particular ideology, it is entirely likely that had the Republican party been drifting towards a centrist position rather than an extreme right-wing position, Wilson would have accordingly been more moderate in his political pronouncements.

As the United States becomes more extreme in its beliefs in general, group polarization and competition, which requires a mutual exclusivity of goal attainment, will lead to more "showdown" situations in which the goal of good government gives way to political posturing and power-mongering. This research was pioneered by James A.

Group polarization tends to exacerbate inter-group competition by driving any two groups who initially disagree farther apart in their respective views.

On Tuesday, November 14,in what has been perceived as the years biggest non-event, the federal government shut down all "non-essential" services due to what was, for all intents and purposes, a game of national "chicken" between the House Speaker and the President.

Beyond costing a lot of money, it had no discernible effect except as a power struggle between two political heavyweights. The two main views behind this polarization are the social comparison and persuasive arguments. Since his decision to run for President was resoundingly unpopular with Californians, and since he may be perceived as unable to compete in national politics due to his withdrawal from the presidential race, his political power may be fatally impaired.

Stonerwho first found the tendency in groups who were considering risk-taking behaviors; the phenomenon was thus initially labeled "risky shift. There are many reasons why people may feel the need to conform to the standards of a group.

He also states that, "Depriving adversaries of personalities, of facesof their subjectivity, is a strategy we automatically adopt in order to win" p. In turn, a competitive situation in which one side must lose in order for the other to win and political situations are nearly always competitivewill codify the differences between groups - leading to further extremism by those seeking power within the group - and thus, to further group polarization.

Humanities/Group Polarization And Competition In Political Behavior term paper 8365

They both presumably desired to run the government well we assume that's why they ran for office in the first placebut they couldn't overcome their hostility long enough to run it at all. What's more, this entire useless episode will be reenacted in mid-December.

For example, Wallach, Kogan, and Bem discovered that individuals may seek greater risks if there is a belief that the risk associated with a decision is shared by all members of the group. We then, somehow, expect them to completely change their behavior once they are elected.

In politics this can be seen as the predilection towards making statements for short term political gain that are either nonsensical or contradictory to past positions held by the candidates themselves. Ironically, Wilson's lust for potential power may cause him to lose the power he actually has.

The New York Times, pp. Group polarization has been applied to understand behavior cases ranging from political and financial decision-making to gambling. The alleged perpetrators were a group of extreme, right wing, "constitutionalists" who were apparently trying to turn frustration with the federal government into open revolution.

In politics this can be seen as the predilection towards making statements for short term political gain that are either nonsensical or contradictory to past positions held by the candidates themselves.

The change in name arose from discoveries about the dynamics of this tendency.

Group Polarization Essay

In addition, the competitive nature of the two party system many times eliminates even the possibility of compromise since failure usually leads to a devastating loss of power.

Indeed, when one examines the eventual compromise that was reached, there seems to be no significant difference in the positions of the two parties. We accept the fact that politicians must compete ruthlessly to gain office using whatever tactics are necessary to win. Indeed, when one examines the eventual compromise that was reached, there seems to be no significant difference in the positions of the two parties.

The Case Against Competition, competition is "mutually exclusive goal attainment" one side must lose in order for the other to winthen compromise and cooperation are impossible p. In his attempt to gain power, Wilson managed to change his stance on virtually every issue he had ever encountered.

His selfish pursuit of power for its own sake was so absolute that it inhibited him from seeing the very political realities that gave him power in the first place. And when the obedience or adherence towards the leader makes its way then this groupthink disable the communication medium and may result a violent behavior against an individual or opposition.

In this paper I will analyze recent political behavior in terms of two factors: It has been speculated that President Lyndon B. What is it about politics and power that seem to always put them at odds with good government.

Another of Kipnis's negative effects of power is the tendency to use it for selfish purposes p. Group Polarization And Competition In Political Behavior Essays: OverGroup Polarization And Competition In Political Behavior Essays, Group Polarization And Competition In Political Behavior Term Papers, Group Polarization And Competition In Political Behavior Research Paper, Book Reports.

ESSAYS, term and. Group Polarization is some sort of shifting of group members in or after a group discussion, to views being preferred as a general direction from the ones they were advocating initially. The two main views behind this polarization are the social comparison and persuasive arguments.

words - 8 pages problem in whether political, economic, cultural way. Works Cited Brumfiel, G. (). Fukushima's legacy of fear. Post Cold Wat Nuclear Deterrence Essay words Group Polarization and Competitioning Political Behavior.

Group Polarization and Competitioning Political Behavior.

Group Polarization And Competition In Political Behavior

Essay by Anonymous User, University, Bachelor's, A+, January download word file, 8 pages, Downloaded times. Keywords Group. polarization tends to exacerbate inter-group competition by driving any.

Group Polarization. Group A Group Think, Group Polarization, Abilene Paradox, Social Influence, Social Comparison, Conformity.

Would your research shed any light on why the strength of people’s opinions changes after group discussion? Explain.

Group Polarization And Competition In Political Behavior

Custom Admission Essay that has been written by qualified professional English writers. Group Polarization and Competition in Political Behavior On Tuesday, November 14,in what has been perceived as the years biggest non-event, the federal government shut down all "non-essential" services due to what was, for all intents and purposes, a game of national "chicken" between the House Speaker and the President.

Group polarization and competitioning political behavior essay
Rated 4/5 based on 51 review
Essay on Humanities. Research Paper on Group Polarization And Competition In Political Behavior